Sample data. Every keyboard on this site is illustrative — nobody has typed on these boards, the measurements are constructed and the photographs are generated placeholders. The whole site is set to noindex until real reviews replace them. What this means
Bottomout.

Review · TKL & full-size

Quarry TKL review: boring in the way good tools are boring

Four months with the Quarry TKL: the fastest board tested here, open QMK firmware, clean stabilisers, no wireless and no backlight. A keyboard with nothing to say for itself.

Verdict for the Quarry TKL

7.9/ 10 · good

A keyboard with no story. It arrives, it works, it does not rattle, the firmware is open, and it disappears into the desk. If you want to be excited about a keyboard, buy the Castor. If you want to stop thinking about keyboards, this is the one.

Build
Typing feel
Sound
Stabilisers
Software
Value

What works

  • QMK firmware, flashable, with source published by the manufacturer
  • Lowest measured latency of any board here at 3.4 ms
  • Stabilisers are clean on every large key including the right shift

What does not

  • Wired only, with a non-detachable cable on this revision
  • No backlighting at all, which some people will care about
  • Case creaks slightly when lifted by one corner
Buy it if
Someone who wants a TKL that will not need anything done to it, and who values open firmware over wireless.
Skip it if
Anyone who needs wireless, backlighting, or a detachable cable.
3 shots · click to enlarge

Measured figures

Sound
55.3
dB(A) at 30 cm
Latency, wired
3.4
ms, median of 500
Polling
1,000
Hz, verified
Actuation
51.7
g, measured on E
Case flex
2.1
mm under 5 kg

Measured on my desk, not read off the box — clearly audible across a room. The manufacturer rates the switches at 50 g; I measured 51.7 g. How each figure is taken.

Nothing to report

Four months in, and the most interesting thing I can say about the Quarry TKL is that there is nothing interesting to say about it.

It arrived. The stabilisers were clean. The switches were consistent. It measured 3.4 ms, the fastest figure on this site. It has sat on the desk since, done its job, and asked for nothing. When I sat down to write this review I had no notes beyond the measurements, because nothing happened that was worth writing down.

That is the review. What follows is elaboration.

The firmware

QMK, with source published by the manufacturer. This is the board’s one genuinely distinguishing feature and it deserves more attention than it usually gets.

VIA — which several boards here support — is a configurator that talks to firmware someone else compiled. It is good, and it covers what most people need. QMK is the firmware itself: you can build it, change it, add layers and macros and tap-dance behaviours that no configurator exposes, and flash it yourself.

The practical difference is ownership. Vendor software can be discontinued. A configurator can drop support for a board. Firmware whose source you have cannot be taken away from you, and on a keyboard you intend to keep for years that is worth something concrete.

The speed

3.4 ms wired at a verified 1000 Hz. Fastest here, ahead of the Aperture at 3.8 ms and comfortably ahead of everything wireless.

Some of this is the firmware path being short and clean. Some of it is simply that the board has no wireless stack to traverse — being wired-only is a limitation that happens to buy you latency. If you are choosing a budget board on measured input lag, this is the answer, and it is not close.

Typing and sound

Polycarbonate plate, gasket mount, 2.1 mm of flex. Softer than the aluminium boards, firmer than the Castor or the Tessera. It sits in the middle and there is nothing wrong with the middle.

55.3 dB with pre-lubed Gateron Yellows. Clean, unremarkable, slightly higher-pitched than I would choose. The stabilisers are properly done on every large key including the right shift, which several boards here get wrong.

The TKL layout keeps the standard cluster gaps — navigation island separated, arrows in their own block. If you are coming from a full-size, everything is exactly where your hands expect it minus the numpad. That transferability is the argument for a TKL over a 75%, and it is a stronger argument than it sounds until you have tried switching.

What it does not do

No wireless. No backlighting at all — not dim, not white, none. And the cable is not detachable on this revision, which is the one thing I would call a genuine design failure rather than an omission, because the cable is the component most likely to fail and here you cannot replace it.

The case also creaks slightly when lifted by one corner. It does not creak while typing, which is what matters, but it is there.

Four months in

Nothing. The stabilisers are unchanged, the sound re-measured at 55.5 dB — within the margin of the first reading — and the sockets are as tight as they were. No degradation of any kind.

Who this is for

Someone who wants to stop thinking about keyboards.

If you want to enjoy a keyboard, buy the Castor — it types better and it has character. If you want the best all-round board with wireless, buy the Ferrule.

Buy this if you want a TKL that will still be working and unchanged in three years, whose firmware you control, and which will never need anything from you. It is boring in the way that good tools are boring.

What happened next

bought Mar 30, 2026 · 132 days
  • After 3 months

    Nothing to report, which is the point. Sound measured again at 55.5 dB — within the margin of the original reading.

Quarry TKL — questions

What does QMK support actually give you?

Firmware you own. QMK is open source, the manufacturer publishes their source for this board, and you can flash your own build — layers, macros, tap-dance, whatever you want. Unlike vendor software it cannot be discontinued, and unlike VIA it is not limited to what the configurator exposes.

Is the non-detachable cable a real problem?

It is a durability question rather than a daily annoyance. The cable is the part most likely to fail on a wired board, and here you cannot replace it. Four months in there is no sign of strain, but it caps the board's realistic lifespan in a way a detachable USB-C port does not.

Why is it faster than more expensive boards?

3.4 ms comes from a clean firmware path with no wireless stack in the way, at a verified 1000 Hz. Wireless boards have to do more work between keypress and report. Being wired-only is a limitation that happens to buy you the lowest latency here.

Is a TKL better than a 75%?

It depends on whether you value spacing or width. A TKL keeps the standard cluster gaps, so muscle memory from a full-size transfers exactly. A 75% packs the same keys into less width, at the cost of the arrow cluster sitting hard against the right shift. Neither is better; they fail differently.

Other boards tested

All 10 reviews →
TKL (87-key)Tactilehot-swap

Vellum TKL

Good board, bad firmware.

6.7/10$68
TKL (87-key)Linearhot-swap

Tessera TKL

The sound is the whole point.

7.5/10$84
Full-size (104-key)Tactilehot-swap

Sable 104

A full-size that does not feel cheap.

6.4/10$58